A
It is the notion of making the unknown explicit, understanding the underlying assumptions, beliefs, values, and experiences that inform one’s actions. (Alvi.U, e-mail, Dec 9, 05)
When we talk about re-conceptualization in teaching, it is described as a learning process that helps teachers to reflect and understand their own beliefs, perceptions and practices of teaching learning process. It also helps teachers to critically analyze their own curriculum orientation and provides an opportunity for enhancing the understanding through discovery of alternatives. In the following section, I will try to analyze the notion of re-conceptualization and its importance for teachers’ professional development in the light of my own experiences.
Link between Reflective Practice and Re-conceptualizationReflection implies more than thinking. It is not only based on reasoning but involves the process of challenging the self for a changed self-perception. This is re-conceptualization. Reflective thinking which is always purposeful (Dinkelman, 2003) is not a routine thinking, but we engage and make decisions through arguments for the rationale and future implication of improvement in self-perception. As Dinkelman (2003) explains that reflective practice enables teachers to think about what they are doing and why, and reason through their problems so that their pedagogy is more appropriate to the given situation.
The basic difference between routine thinking and critical thinking is that the former is objective based but latter is for improvement purpose. For example, in my context, I used to think about the positive and negative aspects of the lesson after every session, which I considered as reflection. Now, I realized that this was not critical thinking process. It might lead to a well-informed teaching process as it is guided by thinking. However, critical thinking directs the teacher to identify and reflect on each part of his/her lesson and to analyze how it could be improved further. This leads towards change in practice, which Fullan (1987) refers as three-dimensional. He identified these changes in terms of material use, teaching approaches and belief as all these three together achieve an educational goal.
My Journey of Re-conceptualization
I started my journey of inquiring my own self at AKU-IED when faculty often asked us to reflect on our practices and perceptions as teachers. I realized that I dominantly had traditional approach of teaching and learning both as a teacher and as a student which include teacher-centered classroom environment and transmission mode of content delivery. With the same philosophy of teaching and learning, I started my journey as a teacher with limited resources and opportunities. Though I never considered my students as empty vessels and my self as the only source of knowledge, most of the time my mode of teaching was based on the transmission nature. This could be due to several reasons; including my own learning experience, time constraints, pressure of syllabus coverage and memorization based evaluation process. I was considered as a good teacher as all my students got good marks in the final board exams. I usually worked with “prepackaged curriculum material” (Fullan, 1987, p. 259), as a result, my students’ learning was based on rote memorization and not on self-creativity. After getting fascinating learning experience at IED, I revisited my existed beliefs and practice. I started thinking the impacts of different teaching orientations on students’ learning. In-fact I am still in the process of re-conceptualizing my beliefs about the processes like planning, teaching and assessment for future implication.
Developing Reflective Practice in the Context
After experiencing the fruit of reflective practice during M.Ed., when I rejoined my school as teacher educator, the biggest question for me was how to nurture the same practice in the context. I followed the guidance of Spilkova (2001) who considered cooperative environment a necessary element for the reflective practice. I knew that if a healthy and a supportive environment is not established, then teachers might show defensiveness instead of insight during reflective practice. With the same belief, I developed several structures and programmes based on the collaborative and friendly culture. Some of these structures are post observation conferences, micro-teaching session, co-planning and co-teaching sessions etc where teachers’ beliefs and practices on several notions are challenged in a humble and polite manner. One of such notions is the notion of assessment where challenging the teachers’ existing practice is the first step from my side and then providing them knowledge and a skill for changed practice is the second step. Many times, I feel that teachers have great tendency to revert back to their original practice. Therefore continuous and repeated opportunity of reflective practice along with necessary support was provided to teachers to help them for the accommodation that is replacing old concepts with new concepts.
Implication
Importance of re-conceptualization to teacher’s professional learning has several implications for teacher education initiatives.
- Re-conceptualization is the best teacher and therefore processes like reflection, self study and critical thinking should be the part of teacher education programme. This reflective practice helps teachers to revisit again and again their practices and to learn and unlearn about teaching learning process.
- A meaningful and lasting change cannot be attained forcefully. The initiative for change should be intrinsic and not extrinsic. However, conductive environment and trustful relation leads to teacher’s acceptance of this notion. This ultimately helps an individual to recognize their own belief and perception and guides them to ways of self-improvement.
- Certain models and structures should be in place in the system to make reflective practice as regular and continuous process. This will give a platform to teachers to develop skills and disposition towards life long learning process.
- Schools should be supportive for the change. This includes the modification in physical infra-structure, classroom setting, resource availability and mode of classroom teaching for maximum learning opportunity.
Conclusion
All above discussion proves that re-conceptualization should be a continuous process that makes us conscious about the learning process. Through this process we explore alternative approaches for new and challenging situations during educational practice. This is the approach through which we challenge our beliefs, notion, practices for better understanding and changes. As a result we develop our professional artistry and make a linkage between the theory and practice.